A Model for Context-sensitive Interpretation of Communicative Feedback
نویسندگان
چکیده
A prevalent and important coordination mechanism in dialogue is communicative 'listener feedback' in form of short verbal-vocal signals (e.g., 'uh-huh', 'yeah', 'huh'), head gestures (e.g., nodding, wiggling) or facial expressions. Listeners' feedback signals are indications of their cogni-tive state and communicate whether listeners and speakers are in contact , whether listeners perceive, understand and accept the speakers' utterance as well as whether they agree to or which attitude they have towards the speakers' utterance (Allwood et al., 1992). Feedback signals are rich in their form – enabling a fine-grained expression of subtle differences in meaning –, multi-functional, and interact heavily with their dialogue context. Consequentially, feedback is only conventionalised to a certain degree. Speakers are nevertheless able to interpret communicative feedback, use it to reason about the lis-tener's cognitive state as well as their common ground, and adapt their language accordingly (Clark, 1996). Our objective is to model this ability of human speakers for artificial conversational agents (e.g., dialogue systems, embodied conversational agents), making them attentive to their users' needs as expressed in their feedback behaviour (Buschmeier & Kopp, 2011). Here we present an agent-centric cognitive model for the interpretation of feedback signals in their dialogue context. It uses features of the feedback behaviour observed by the agent as well as the agent's utterance , expectations and knowledge about the task to reason about an 'attributed listener state' (ALS; the agent's reconstruction of the user's cognitive state) and the grounding status of information. Using the framework of Bayesian networks, the model represents ALS and common ground probabilistically in terms of degrees of belief. Because of this, it is straightforward to deal with the uncertainties inherent in the observations, the form-meaning relation of a feedback signal and the user's behaviour.
منابع مشابه
Iranian EFL Learners’ Reactions to Different Feedbacks in Writing Classrooms: Teacher Written Comments (TWC) vs. Peer Written Comments (PWC)
The teaching of writing has recently begun to move away from a concentration on the written product to an emphasis on the process of writing. Feedback is a fundamental element of the process approach to writing. It can be defined as input from a reader to a writer with the effect of providing information to the writer for a revision. This study reports on the effectiveness of two types of feedb...
متن کاملA Mark Up Language For Tagging Discourse And Annotating Documents In Context Sensitive Interpretation Environments
A mark up language for tagging discourse, and for converting discourse sequences into a written format, according to highly context sensitive procedures, will be illustrated as well as a system for document annotation. The context in which a given communicative intercourse has taken place needs to be made available to ensure consistent interpretation of both single sequences of discourse and gl...
متن کاملA context-sensitive dynamic role-based access control model for pervasive computing environments
Resources and services are accessible in pervasive computing environments from anywhere and at any time. Also, due to ever-changing nature of such environments, the identity of users is unknown. However, users must be able to access the required resources based on their contexts. These and other similar complexities necessitate dynamic and context-aware access control models for such environmen...
متن کاملTHREE TYPES OF COMMENTS ON CONTENT: TEACHER VS. PEER FEEDBACK
This study was conducted to examine the effect of three types of comments, i.e. imperatives, questions, and statements, with different communicative purposes, i.e. giving information and making a request, given by an ELT teacher and peers on students’ revision of their writings. Sixty-four female students, between 16 and 26 years old studying at high-intermediate level of English language prof...
متن کاملUnderstanding How Well You Understood - Context- Sensitive Interpretation of Multimodal User Feedback
Human interlocutors continuously show behaviour indicative of their perception, understanding, acceptance and agreement of and with the other’s utterances [1,4]. Such evidence can be provided in the form of verbal-vocal feedback signals, head gestures, facial expressions or gaze and often interacts with the current dialogue context. As feedback signals are able to express subtle differences in ...
متن کامل